ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Our objective was to describe differences in telemedicine use among women with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) by race, age, and geographic region. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of women with recurrent or de novo mBC treated in US community cancer practices that initiated a new line of therapy between March 2020 and February 2021. Multivariable modified Poisson regression models were used to calculate adjusted rate ratios (RR) and robust 95% confidence intervals (CI) associated with telemedicine visits within 90 days of therapy initiation. RESULTS: Overall, among 3412 women with mBC, 751 (22%) patients had telemedicine visits following therapy initiation, with lower risks observed among older women (<50 years: 24%; 50-64 years: 22%; 65-74 years: 21%; ≥75 years: 20%). Greater telemedicine use was observed among Asian women (35%) compared to White (21%), Black (18%), and Hispanic (21%) women. Fewer telemedicine visits occurred in Southern (12%) and Midwestern (17%) states versus Northeastern (37%) or Western (36%) states. In multivariable models, women ages ≥75 years had significantly lower risks of telemedicine visits (RR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.62-0.95) compared to ages <50 years. Compared to patients in Northeastern states, women in Midwestern (RR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.37-0.57) and Southern (RR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.26-0.37) states had significantly lower risks of telemedicine visits; but not women in Western states (RR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.83-1.12). No statistically significant differences in telemedicine use were found between racial groups in overall multivariable models. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of community cancer practices, older mBC patients and those living in Southern and Midwestern states were less likely to have telemedicine visits. Preferences for communication and delivery of care may have implications for measurement of exposures and endpoints in pharmacoepidemiologic studies of cancer patients.
ABSTRACT
Background Vaccine hesitancy, defined as the delay in acceptance or refusal of safe vaccines, remains a challenge in the general population. Given that patients with hematologic malignancies frequently encounter healthcare professionals and are at high risk of severe COVID-19 infection, their attitudes towards vaccines may differ from other patient groups. We therefore performed a survey-based study to investigate vaccine hesitancy within an ethnically diverse group of patients diagnosed with hematologic malignancies. Methods We administered a 122-item questionnaire from December 2020 to January 2021 (prior to commercial availability of the COVID-19 vaccines) to 60 patients with hematologic malignancies. Questions were separated into the following categories: demographic and socioeconomic data;personal impact of COVID-19 infection;COVID-19 pandemic experience;COVID-19 infection perceptions;COVID-19 vaccine perceptions;and baseline COVID-19 vaccine knowledge. Results The majority of patients were Black (n=33, 55%) or Hispanic (n=11, 18.3%) and were undergoing active treatment (n=43, 71.7%) or had received prior hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (n=9, 15%). Eight (13.3%) patients had prior COVID-19 infection. Sixteen (26.7%) patients reported infection in an immediate family member while 15 (25%) reported infection in a friend. 20 of these cases were moderate in severity requiring healthcare interaction, and 17 of these cases were reported to result in severe infection (n=7, 9.6%) or death (n=10, 13.7%). Only 16 (29.6%) patients perceived themselves to be at high or very high risk of COVID-19 infection. The COVID-19 pandemic was reported to moderately or severely affect employment/income in 10 (22.8%) patients and led to worse mental health in 10 (22.3%) patients. However, the majority of patients reported no negative impact on their cancer treatment (n=37, 88.1%) or prognosis (n=45, 93.8%). Of the 60 patients, 22 (40.7%) reported that if a COVID-19 vaccine was made publicly available in the next 30 days, they would not vaccinate themselves, either due to safety concerns (n=4, 20%) or indifference (n=6, 30%). Despite this, 43 (78.2%) patients stated that vaccination was an important tool in ending the pandemic. More patients agreed to accept the vaccine if it was made available in 6 months from the time of survey (n=40, 76.9%). Only 32 (59.3%) patients were extremely or very likely to accept a yearly vaccine. In terms of perception on cancer outcomes, 31 (62%) patients were uncertain if the vaccine would interact negatively with their current chemotherapy treatment, while 27 (52.9%) believed the vaccine would make their cancer worse. The biggest fear patients had about COVID-19 vaccines were side effects or death (n=15, 38.5%) and complications to cancer/cancer therapy (n=5, 12.8%). Only 6 (15.4%) patients stated they had no fears related to COVID-19 vaccination. In fact, only 21 (39.6%) patients agreed or strongly agreed that the side effects of most vaccines outweigh the benefits. In a modified (age- and sex-adjusted) Poisson regression model (Table 1) that included baseline demographics and answers to select survey questions, older age was associated with a stronger likelihood of vaccine acceptance (RR 1.73, 95% CI 1.11-2.71;p=0.016), while female gender was associated with less likelihood to accept the vaccine (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37-0.90;p=0.016). Patients reported as “other” race (e.g., Asian) were more inclined to accept the vaccine (RR. 2.21, 95% CI 1.16-4.20;p=0.016) compared to White patients. Finally, when compared to patients who receive information primarily from medical professionals, those patients who received their information from social media or friends were far less likely to accept the vaccine (RR 0.02, 95% CI 0.01-0.04;p<0.001). Conclusion This is the first study to report that although patients with hematologic malignancies experienced significant medical and social burdens from the COVID-19 pandemic and have frequent interaction with healthcare professionals, a high rate of CO
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to delays in patients seeking care for life-threatening conditions; however, its impact on treatment patterns for patients with metastatic cancer is unknown. We assessed the COVID-19 pandemic's impact on time to treatment initiation (TTI) and treatment selection for patients newly diagnosed with metastatic solid cancer. METHODS: We used an electronic health record-derived longitudinal database curated via technology-enabled abstraction to identify 14 136 US patients newly diagnosed with de novo or recurrent metastatic solid cancer between January 1 and July 31 in 2019 or 2020. Patients received care at approximately 280 predominantly community-based oncology practices. Controlled interrupted time series analyses assessed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic period (April-July 2020) on TTI, defined as the number of days from metastatic diagnosis to receipt of first-line systemic therapy, and use of myelosuppressive therapy. RESULTS: The adjusted probability of treatment within 30 days of diagnosis was similar across periods (January-March 2019 = 41.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 32.2% to 51.1%; April-July 2019 = 42.6%, 95% CI = 32.4% to 52.7%; January-March 2020 = 44.5%, 95% CI = 30.4% to 58.6%; April-July 2020 = 46.8%, 95% CI= 34.6% to 59.0%; adjusted percentage-point difference-in-differences = 1.4%, 95% CI = -2.7% to 5.5%). Among 5962 patients who received first-line systemic therapy, there was no association between the pandemic period and use of myelosuppressive therapy (adjusted percentage-point difference-in-differences = 1.6%, 95% CI = -2.6% to 5.8%). There was no meaningful effect modification by cancer type, race, or age. CONCLUSIONS: Despite known pandemic-related delays in surveillance and diagnosis, the COVID-19 pandemic did not affect TTI or treatment selection for patients with metastatic solid cancers.